Kritikan Wikinews

Seperti Wikipedia (lihat Kritikan Wikipedia), Wikinews dikritik kerana dapat tidak bersifat neutral atau melampirkan maklumat yang disahkan dan benar. Robert McHenry, bekas ketua pengarang Encyclopædia Britannica mengkritik kredibiliti projek tersebut :

Above all, the central question about the Wikinews effort is its credibility. "Making a newspaper is hard...Someone who wants to do it but doesn't really know how hasn't solved the problem by gathering a lot of other people who don't know, either.

McHenry was skeptical about Wikinews' ability to provide a neutral point of view and its claim to be evenhanded. "The naivete is stunning," he said.

In a 2007 interview Sue Gardner, a special advisor to the board of the Wikimedia Foundation and former head of CBC.ca, dismissed McHenry's comment, stating "Journalism is not a profession ... at its heart, it's just a craft. And that means that it can be practiced by anyone who is sensible and intelligent and thoughtful and curious ... I go back to the morning of Virginia Tech - the morning I decided I wanted to work here [WMF]. The conversation on the talk page that day was extremely thoughtful. I remember thinking to myself that if my own newsroom had been having a conversation that intelligent (I was offsite that day) I would have been delighted. So yes, IMO you absolutely have proved Robert McHenry wrong. And you will continue to."

Rujukan

WikiPedia: Wikinews http://feeds.feedburner.com/WikinewsLatestNews http://translate.google.com/translate?u=https://en... http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/10/technology/circu... http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2004/1... http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,65819,00.... http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-5572826-2.html?... http://prpm.dbp.gov.my/ http://www.inic.org/wikinews.xml http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:W... http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews_switches_to_C...