Rujukan Brexit

  1. Hall, Damien (11 August 2017). "'Breksit' or 'bregzit'? The question that divides a nation". The Conversation (dalam bahasa Inggeris). 
  2. 1 2 Asa Bennett (27 January 2020). "How will the Brexit transition period work?". Telegraph. 
  3. 1 2 Tom Edgington (31 January 2020). "Brexit: What is the transition period?". BBC News. 
  4. "Questions and Answers on the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union on 31 January 2020". European Commission. 24 January 2020. 
  5. "Revised Withdrawal Agreement" (PDF). European Commission. 17 October 2019. Dicapai 17 October 2019.  Parameter |url-status= tidak diketahui diabaikan (bantuan)
  6. "New Brexit deal agreed, says Boris Johnson". BBC News. 17 October 2019. Dicapai 17 October 2019. 
  7. Landler, Mark; Castle, Stephen (12 December 2019). "Conservatives Win Commanding Majority in U.K. Vote: 'Brexit Will Happen'". The New York Times. New York City: New York Times Company. Dicapai 12 December 2019 – melalui MSN
  8. Boffey, Daniel; Proctor, Kate (24 January 2020). "Boris Johnson signs Brexit withdrawal agreement". The Guardian. Dicapai 24 January 2020. 
  9. Sparrow, Andrew (30 January 2020). "Brexit: MEPs approve withdrawal agreement after emotional debate and claims UK will return - live news". The Guardian. Dicapai 30 January 2020. 
  10. "Brexit: UK leaves the European Union". BBC News. 31 January 2020. Dicapai 1 February 2020. 
  11. 1 2 Goodman, Peter S. (20 May 2016). "'Brexit,' a Feel-Good Vote That Could Sink Britain's Economy". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Dicapai 28 November 2017. finding economists who say they believe that a Brexit will spur the British economy is like looking for a doctor who thinks forswearing vegetables is the key to a long life 
  12. 1 2
  13. 1 2 Baldwin, Richard (31 July 2016). "Brexit Beckons: Thinking ahead by leading economists". VoxEU.org. Dicapai 22 November 2017. On 23 June 2016, 52% of British voters decided that being the first country ever to leave the EU was a price worth paying for 'taking back control', despite advice from economists clearly showing that Brexit would make the UK 'permanently poorer' (HM Treasury 2016). The extent of agreement among economists on the costs of Brexit was extraordinary: forecast after forecast supported similar conclusions (which have so far proved accurate in the aftermath of the Brexit vote). 
  14. 1 2 "Brexit survey". Initiative on Global Markets, University of Chicago. Dicapai 1 November 2017. 
  15. 1 2 "Brexit survey II". Initiative on Global Markets, University of Chicago. Dicapai 1 November 2017. 
  16. 1 2 Sodha, Sonia; Helm, Toby; Inman, Phillip (28 May 2016). "Economists overwhelmingly reject Brexit in boost for Cameron". The Observer. ISSN 0029-7712. Dicapai 1 November 2017. 
  17. 1 2 "Most economists still pessimistic about effects of Brexit". Financial Times. Dicapai 22 November 2017. 
  18. 1 2 "Brexit will damage UK standards of living, say economists". Financial Times. Dicapai 22 November 2017. Unlike the short-term effects of Brexit, which have been better than most had predicted, most economists say the ultimate impact of leaving the EU still appears likely to be more negative than positive. But the one thing almost all agree upon is that no one will know how big the effects are for some time. 
  19. 1 2 Wren-Lewis, Simon. "Why is the academic consensus on the cost of Brexit being ignored?". The Conversation (dalam bahasa Inggeris). Dicapai 22 November 2017. 
  20. 1 2 "Brexit to Hit Jobs, Wealth and Output for Years to Come, Economists Say". Bloomberg L.P. 22 February 2017. Dicapai 22 November 2017. The U.K. economy may be paying for Brexit for a long time to come ... It won't mean Armageddon, but the broad consensus among economists—whose predictions about the initial fallout were largely too pessimistic—is for a prolonged effect that will ultimately diminish output, jobs and wealth to some degree. 
  21. 1 2 Johnson, Paul; Mitchell, Ian (1 March 2017). "The Brexit vote, economics, and economic policy". Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 33 (suppl_1): S12–S21. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx017. ISSN 0266-903X
  22. 1 2 "Most economists say Brexit will hurt the economy—but one disagrees". The Economist (dalam bahasa Inggeris). Dicapai 22 November 2017. 
  23. 1 2 "This is the real reason the UK's economic forecasts look so bad". The Independent. 23 November 2017. Dicapai 28 November 2017. One thing economists do generally agree on is that leaving the European Union and putting new trade barriers between Britain and our largest and closest trading partners is extremely unlikely to boost UK productivity growth—and is far more likely to slow it 
  24. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2020/01/20/imf-rebukes-trump-global-growth-gets-downgrade/
  25. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/british-economy-will-grow-faster-than-eurozone-rivals-says-imf-k2h3vbdjm
  26. "Britain and the EU: A Brixit looms". The Economist. 21 Jun 2012. Dicapai 1 April 2017. 
  27. "Brexit: What are the options? Alternative Brexit models". BBC News. 15 Januari 2017. Dicapai 1 April 2017. 
  28. "What is a no-deal Brexit? Here are the consequences of the UK leaving the EU without a deal". inews.co.uk. 4 September 2019. 
  29. McClean, Paul (30 May 2017). "After Brexit: the UK will need to renegotiate at least 759 treaties". Financial Times. Dicapai 31 May 2017. Through analysis of the EU treaty database, the FT found 759 separate EU bilateral agreements with potential relevance to Britain, covering trade in nuclear goods, customs, fisheries, trade, transport and regulatory co-operation in areas such as antitrust or financial services. This includes multilateral agreements based on consensus, where Britain must re-approach 132 separate parties. Around 110 separate opt-in accords at the UN and World Trade Organization are excluded from the estimates, as are narrow agreements on the environment, health, research and science. Some additional UK bilateral deals, outside the EU framework, may also need to be revised because they make reference to EU law. Some of the 759 are so essential that it would be unthinkable to operate without them. Air services agreements allow British aeroplanes to land in America, Canada or Israel; nuclear accords permit the trade in spare parts and fuel for Britain's power stations. Both these sectors are excluded from trade negotiations and must be addressed separately. 
  30. "Brexit: Everyone Loses, but Britain Loses the Most". PIIE (dalam bahasa Inggeris). 1 March 2019. Dicapai 17 March 2019. 
  31. "Question C: Leaving the European Union without a trade agreement would have a large negative impact on the UK economy". www.igmchicago.org. Dicapai 21 December 2019.  Parameter |url-status= tidak diketahui diabaikan (bantuan)
  32. Crowley, Meredith; Exton, Oliver; Han, Lu (21 January 2019). "The impact of Brexit uncertainty on UK exports". VoxEU.org. Dicapai 21 January 2019. 
  33. "DP13446 Renegotiation of Trade Agreements and Firm Exporting Decisions: Evidence from the Impact of Brexit on UK Exports". cepr.org (dalam bahasa Inggeris). Dicapai 21 January 2019. 
  34. Graziano, Alejandro; Handley, Kyle; Limão, Nuno (2018). "Brexit Uncertainty and Trade Disintegration". doi:10.3386/w25334
  35. Soegaard, Christian. "Brexit has already hurt EU and non-EU exports by up to 13% – new research". The Conversation (dalam bahasa Inggeris). Dicapai 5 November 2018. 
  36. Douch, Mustapha; Edwards, T. Huw; Soegaard, Christian (2018). "The Trade Effects of the Brexit Announcement Shock" (dalam bahasa Inggeris). Diarkibkan daripada asal pada 6 November 2018. Dicapai 5 November 2018.  Parameter |url-status= tidak diketahui diabaikan (bantuan)
Rencana tentang politik ini rencana tunas. Anda boleh membantu Wikipedia dengan mengembangkannya.