Nota Harta_intelek

  1. Intellectual Property Licensing: Forms and Analysis, by Richard Raysman, Edward A. Pisacreta and Kenneth A. Adler. Law Journal Press, 1998-2008. ISBN 973588520869Templat:Please check ISBN Templat:Verify source
  2. 1 2 " property as a common descriptor of the field probably traces to the foundation of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) by the United Nations." in Mark A. Lemley, Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding, Texas Law Review, 2005, Vol. 83:1031, page 1033, footnote 4.
  3. Brad, Sherman (1999). The making of modern intellectual property law: the British experience, 1760-1911. Cambridge University Press. m/s. 207. ISBN 978-0-521-56363-5.  Parameter |coauthors= tidak diketahui diabaikan (guna |author=) (bantuan)
  4. Toh Mei Ling, "Still some way to go for IP", The Edge Malaysia, 14 April 2008
  5. 'Article 4 No. 6 of the Constitution of 1867 (German)' Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 52, p. 1255, 2001
  6. Mark A. Lemley, "Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding" (Abstract); see Table 1: 4-5.
  7. Mossoff, A. 'Rethinking the Development of Patents: An Intellectual History, 1550-1800,' Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 52, p. 1255, 2001
  8. (Perancis) Benjamin de Constant de Rebecque, Collection complète des ouvrages publiés sur le gouvernement représentatif et la constitution actuelle de la France: formant une espèce de cours de politique constitutionnelle, P. Plancher, 1818, p. 296.
  9. 1 Woodb. & M. 53, 3 West.L.J. 151, 7 F.Cas. 197, No. 3662, 2 Robb.Pat.Cas. 303, Merw.Pat.Inv. 414
  10. A Brief History of the Patent Law of the United States
  11. "Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding", Mark A. Lemley, Texas Law Review 2007
  12. Jewish Law and Copyright
  13. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tlr83&div=30&g_sent=1&collection=journals
  14. Prudential Reasons for IPR Reform, University of Melbourne, Doris Schroeder and Peter Singer, May 2009
  15. Levine, David (2008-09-07). Against intellectual monopoly (PDF). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-87928-6.  Parameter |coauthors= tidak diketahui diabaikan (guna |author=) (bantuan)
  16. http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/about-ip/en/iprm/pdf/ch1.pdf p. 3.
  17. U.S. Const., art. 1, sec. 8, cl. 8.
  18. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tlr83&div=30&g_sent=1&collection=journals
  19. Richard M. Stallman. "Did You Say "Intellectual Property"? It's a Seductive Mirage". Free Software Foundation, Inc. Dicapai 2008-03-28. 
  20. 1 2 "Against perpetual copyright"
  21. On patents - Daniel B. Ravicher (August 6, 2008). "Protecting Freedom In The Patent System: The Public Patent Foundation's Mission and Activities"
  22. Joseph Stiglitz (October 13, 2006). "Authors@Google: Joseph Stiglitz - Making Globalization Work"
  23. WIPO - World Intellectual Property Organization. "Human Rights and Intellectual Property: An Overview". Dicapai October 25, 2011. 
  24. Chapman, Audrey R. (2002). "The Human Rights Implications of Intellectual Property Protection". Journal of International Economic Law. 5 (4): 861–882. doi:10.1093/jiel/5.4.861. Dicapai October 25, 2011.  Parameter |month= tidak diketahui diabaikan (bantuan)
  25. E.g., the U.S. Copyright Term Extension Act, Pub.L. 105-298.
  26. Mark Helprin, Op-ed: A Great Idea Lives Forever. Shouldn't Its Copyright? The New York Times, May 20, 2007.
  27. Eldred v. Ashcroft Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U. S. 186 (2003)
  28. Mike Masnick (May 21, 2007). "Arguing For Infinite Copyright... Using Copied Ideas And A Near Total Misunderstanding Of Property". techdirt
  29. Council for Responsible Genetics, DNA Patents Create Monopolies on Living Organisms. Accessed 2008.12.18.
  30. Plant Patents USPTO.gov
  31. Sebagai contoh, AstraZeneca memegang pendaftaran bagi cap dagang untuk warna ungu, sebagaimana digunakan bagi pil kapsul. AstraZeneca, Nexium: Legal. Accessed 2008.12.18.
  32. Birgitte Andersen. Intellectual Property Right' Or 'IntellectualMonopoly Privilege': Which One Should PatentAnalysts Focus On? CONFERÊNCIA INTERNACIONAL SOBRE SISTEMAS DE INOVAÇÃO E ESTRATÉGIAS DE DESENVOLVIMENTO PARA O TERCEIRO MILÊNIO • NOV. 2003
  33. Martin G, Sorenson C and Faunce TA. Balancing intellectual monopoly privileges and the need for essential medicines Globalization and Health 2007, 3:4 doi:10.1186/1744-8603-3-4. "Balancing the need to protect the intellectual property rights (IPRs) ("which the third author considers are more accurately described as intellectual monopoly privileges (IMPs)) of pharmaceutical companies, with the need to ensure access to essential medicines in developing countries is one of the most pressing challenges facing international policy makers today.")

Rujukan

WikiPedia: Harta_intelek http://resolver.scholarsportal.info.myaccess.libra... http://www.free-culture.cc/freeculture.pdf http://www.dklevine.com/archive/refs41222470000000... http://www.dklevine.com/papers/imbookfinalall.pdf http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/... http://www.google.com/books?id=u2aMRA-eF1gC&dq=sta... http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/copyright1.html http://www.ladas.com/Patents/USPatentHistory.html http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/20/opinion/20helpri... http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=320...